You may also be
interested in
Just a couple of notes about constructive complexity.
Originally this was going to be part of an article entitled
Constructive Complexity Today, where I'd go over stuff like body modification and ecological conservation and whatnot and why these things would be considered Good in any ethical system that held constructive complexity as its terminal value. Then I realized that most of it was superfluous fluff.
I guess that the polyamory one might bear some discussion later on, but still the majority of the article could be summed up as "These things: they are good. Bcz net complexity." That is to say, until it's proven to the contrary I'm going to assume that if you think that paving over the whole entire world is a good thing, then our disagreement lies in our terminal values and not in how we're interpreting constructive complexity.
There are still
some things worth saying, though.
Table of Contents
I. Agency, or Liberty
II. A Quick Note on (Transhumanist) Abolitionism
III. Constructive Complexity vs. Alternative Terminal Values
IV. Why Love Doesn't Work (as a terminal value)